Workshop 1 · the model

Riftveil · AI Judgment Essentials

Know where your own judgment stops with AI. A half-day to see, on your own work, where you stop judging and start signing. You leave with three of your recent decisions put to the test, and a commitment for the next one.

At a glance

Format and key facts

  • Format · In-person workshop
  • Length · Half-day, 3 h 30, one break
  • Group · 12 participants at most, at tables of 4 to 6
  • Led by · A Riftveil Certified Trainer
  • Prerequisites · You read, approve, sign or pass on work that AI contributed to. You do not need to use AI yourself.
  • Before the workshop · Nothing to prepare
  • Certificate · Riftveil · AI Judgment Essentials, numbered and verifiable online

Who it is for

Anyone who reads, approves or passes on work that AI contributed to: managers, analysts, legal and compliance, finance, regulated professions, executive committees. No prior knowledge is needed: this is the starting point, and the first half of Riftveil · AI Decision Advanced.

What it covers

  • See where your own judgment stops when you work with AI
  • Recognise automation bias and the silent transfer of responsibility
  • Place the claims your decisions depend on in relation to your AI frontier
  • Put three of your recent decisions to the test before you sign the next one

What you take away

Given to each participant

  • Your diagnostic result and your reading of the situations
  • Your three decisions put to the test, and a written commitment
  • A task-by-task record of how you use AI, with a private personal report
  • The Riftveil · AI Judgment Essentials certificate, verifiable online

Confidentiality

Your personal report and your workbook belong to you. Your organisation receives the attendance list and an aggregated, anonymous summary, never an individual profile, result or document.

Sample Riftveil · AI Judgment Essentials certificate of completion

What comes next Riftveil · AI Oversight Essentials

The same decision examined twice: “should a human have stopped here?”, then “what needs checking, and by whom?”.